What happened in Muller v Oregon?
What happened in Muller v Oregon?
Muller v. Oregon (1908) is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a state could limit the amount of hours a woman could work while not also limiting the hours of men. On September 4, 1905, he required a female employee to work more than ten hours in a single day.
What was the outcome of the 1908 case of Muller v Oregon?
Muller v. Oregon, one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era, upheld an Oregon law limiting the workday for female wage earners to ten hours.
What is the significance of Muller v Oregon quizlet?
A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women. The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health.
Why did Muller believe the Oregon law was unconstitutional?
Referring to the Fourteenth Amendment, Muller argued the Oregon law was unconstitutional since “the statute [law} does not apply equally to all persons . . . ” Brandeis, using the lengthy brief, countered that women as a group needed special protection.
Who was responsible for Muller v Oregon?
Curt Muller
Background. Curt Muller, the owner of a laundry business, was convicted of violating Oregon labor laws by making a female employee work more than ten hours in a single day. Muller was fined $10.
When was Muller v Oregon overturned?
1923
Parrish, the Court–drawing on Muller v. Oregon–overruled its 1923 decision in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital to uphold Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and minors. The justices had nudged the liberty of contract doctrine off its pedestal.
Who was responsible for the case Muller v Oregon?
What was the main argument of each side in Muller v Oregon?
In Muller vs. Oregon, a laundry owner argued that limiting women to a ten-hour work day was an unconstitutional violation of their right to choose their own employment. Due in large part to a unique legal brief by Louis Brandeis, the Supreme Court concluded that the states could limit the working hours of women.
Why did the Muller v Oregon cause controversy quizlet?
the Court struck down the minimum wage law as unconstitutional, arguing that it violated the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment.
Was Muller v Oregon a victory for the women’s movement?
Although contemporary Progressive reformers applauded the decision as a victory in the battle for improved working conditions for women, some equal rights feminists recognized that the decision offered protection by reinforcing gender stereotypes, an argument that would ultimately restrict the economic opportunities …
What overturned Muller v Oregon?
Parrish, the Court–drawing on Muller v. Oregon–overruled its 1923 decision in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital to uphold Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and minors. The justices had nudged the liberty of contract doctrine off its pedestal.
Why is Muller v Oregon 1908 considered a landmark case quizlet?
This was a landmark Supreme Court decision because it relates to both sex discrimination and labor laws.
What was the significance of Muller v Oregon?
Muller v. Oregon, one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era, upheld an Oregon law limiting the workday for female wage earners to ten hours. The case established a precedent in 1908 to expand the reach of state activity into the realm of protective labor legislation.
Why did Curt Muller appeal to the Supreme Court?
After being convicted and charged with a $10 fine, Curt Muller appealed to the Oregon Supreme Court. Muller claimed that the charges violated his right to freely contract under the US Constitution. During this case, the question of if the law passed violated the women equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Who was the plaintiff in error v Oregon?
Curt Muller, Plaintiff in Error v. The State of Oregon. Appellant’s claim: Oregon’s 1903 maximum hours law is unconstitutional.
What was the law in Oregon in 1903?
In response to keeping up with the initiative if the Progressive Era, the state of Oregon followed suit. In 1903, their Legislative Assembly adopted a new bill entitled House Bill Number 89. This bill established a ten-hour work day statute for women that worked in laundries and factories.